The toxic plastics chemical Bisphenol A (BPA) has recently been in the news. For CEH, BPA exemplifies many of the more problematic aspects of our country's approach to harmful chemicals in everyday products, and a look at the history and science around BPA is instructive for all who are working to end toxic health threats to our children and families.
BPA and chemical policy history
BPA was first created in the late 1800s, and in the 1930s it was rediscovered by scientists who were looking for a drug that would prevent miscarriages and be used to treat women who suffered from menstrual problems. In their tinkering, they found BPA would work because it can mimic the female hormone estrogen. BPA was abandoned as a drug when the more potent (and now notorious) hormone replacement drug diethylstilbestrol (DES) was discovered, but BPA soon became widely used in other ways: in plastics, in the lining of canned foods, and in other everyday products.
Apparently no one thought that it might be a bad idea to expose people to a chemical that was known to alter the bodies' natural hormones and potentially cause serious reproductive health problems. And no government rules required companies to demonstrate that BPA would be safe in their products before the products were sold to millions of Americans.
But that was the Depression-era 1930s -- surely things are better today, right?
Sadly, the situation today is worse. Companies can continue to use BPA and any number of the more than 80,000 chemicals that are on the market without demonstrating first that they are safe for our children and families. Our country's chemical safety rules were inadequate when they were developed in the 1970s, and today the law still allows companies to sell risky, untested chemicals.
BPA Today: Science and Policy at Odds
Recently the FDA acknowledged that BPA can leach into food from packaging, while reiterating its position that the low BPA levels in our food are safe. French food safety regulators disagreed and have banned packaging with BPA, but European authorities came to a similar conclusion as FDA.
That sounds like good news, until you look at the science more closely. When it comes to chemicals like BPA that can disrupt our natural hormones, many scientists say that low doses may be even more harmful than higher doses. That's because large doses of these chemicals can overwhelm the receptors in our bodies where hormones do their work. Smaller doses can "fit" into these receptors and damage our health, with studies linking BPA to cancer, developmental and reproductive health problems, heart disease, diabetes and obesity and other serious concerns.
What's more, just days after FDA's reassurances were made public, a new study linked BPA exposures to spikes in blood pressure. In just the last few weeks, two more animal studies have come out linking low-dose BPA exposures to developmental health problems (including potential effects on sperm production) and to impacts on fetal brain development.
While FDA maintains its anti-science policy, others are taking a more proactive stance. Several states have banned or restricted uses of BPA, especially in products for young children. And while the FDA was declaring BPA safe, in December a California court ruled that state scientists were correct when they found that BPA is a chemical known to cause serious reproductive health problems.
How to Avoid BPA and Understand "BPA-Free"
If you shop for safer plastics, especially kids' products, you likely have seen labels that say products are "BPA-Free." In some cases, these products may be safer -- but without regulations that require safety testing and labeling, we can't know what new, potentially harmful chemicals might be used in place of BPA (one BPA replacement is already suspected of disrupting normal brain development). Without such rules, companies play a toxic shell game: They use risky, untested chemicals until overwhelming evidence of health problems forces regulators to ban the chemical -- and then they switch to newer, equally risky untested chemicals.
CEH is pushing Congress to adopt real chemical safety rules that put our children's and families' health first. In the meantime, look for products like canned foods from companies that say they don't use BPA, use glass or stainless steel food containers in place of plastics, and avoid paper receipts (which can be made with BPA) and other hidden BPA hazards.
from Healthy Living - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1ANV9E3
via IFTTT
BPA and chemical policy history
BPA was first created in the late 1800s, and in the 1930s it was rediscovered by scientists who were looking for a drug that would prevent miscarriages and be used to treat women who suffered from menstrual problems. In their tinkering, they found BPA would work because it can mimic the female hormone estrogen. BPA was abandoned as a drug when the more potent (and now notorious) hormone replacement drug diethylstilbestrol (DES) was discovered, but BPA soon became widely used in other ways: in plastics, in the lining of canned foods, and in other everyday products.
Apparently no one thought that it might be a bad idea to expose people to a chemical that was known to alter the bodies' natural hormones and potentially cause serious reproductive health problems. And no government rules required companies to demonstrate that BPA would be safe in their products before the products were sold to millions of Americans.
But that was the Depression-era 1930s -- surely things are better today, right?
Sadly, the situation today is worse. Companies can continue to use BPA and any number of the more than 80,000 chemicals that are on the market without demonstrating first that they are safe for our children and families. Our country's chemical safety rules were inadequate when they were developed in the 1970s, and today the law still allows companies to sell risky, untested chemicals.
BPA Today: Science and Policy at Odds
Recently the FDA acknowledged that BPA can leach into food from packaging, while reiterating its position that the low BPA levels in our food are safe. French food safety regulators disagreed and have banned packaging with BPA, but European authorities came to a similar conclusion as FDA.
That sounds like good news, until you look at the science more closely. When it comes to chemicals like BPA that can disrupt our natural hormones, many scientists say that low doses may be even more harmful than higher doses. That's because large doses of these chemicals can overwhelm the receptors in our bodies where hormones do their work. Smaller doses can "fit" into these receptors and damage our health, with studies linking BPA to cancer, developmental and reproductive health problems, heart disease, diabetes and obesity and other serious concerns.
What's more, just days after FDA's reassurances were made public, a new study linked BPA exposures to spikes in blood pressure. In just the last few weeks, two more animal studies have come out linking low-dose BPA exposures to developmental health problems (including potential effects on sperm production) and to impacts on fetal brain development.
While FDA maintains its anti-science policy, others are taking a more proactive stance. Several states have banned or restricted uses of BPA, especially in products for young children. And while the FDA was declaring BPA safe, in December a California court ruled that state scientists were correct when they found that BPA is a chemical known to cause serious reproductive health problems.
How to Avoid BPA and Understand "BPA-Free"
If you shop for safer plastics, especially kids' products, you likely have seen labels that say products are "BPA-Free." In some cases, these products may be safer -- but without regulations that require safety testing and labeling, we can't know what new, potentially harmful chemicals might be used in place of BPA (one BPA replacement is already suspected of disrupting normal brain development). Without such rules, companies play a toxic shell game: They use risky, untested chemicals until overwhelming evidence of health problems forces regulators to ban the chemical -- and then they switch to newer, equally risky untested chemicals.
CEH is pushing Congress to adopt real chemical safety rules that put our children's and families' health first. In the meantime, look for products like canned foods from companies that say they don't use BPA, use glass or stainless steel food containers in place of plastics, and avoid paper receipts (which can be made with BPA) and other hidden BPA hazards.
from Healthy Living - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1ANV9E3
via IFTTT
No comments:
Post a Comment